Security and insurance aren't rivals, they're two positions on the same team – just as in the homepage's scene, Szilárd and Blöki keep watch overnight, Dóri handles fire safety, and insurance is there for whatever still slips through. Let's look at how they relate, factually.
- Security appears in burglary cover as a requirement: the level you've committed to has to actually work.
- The expected level typically depends on the sum insured and the specific terms – there's no one-size-fits-all rule.
- Good security prevents losses, provides evidence when one happens, and improves your risk profile too.
Security as a requirement
Behind burglary cover stand security requirements: mechanical protection (locks, grilles), an electronic alarm system (an alarm, in some cases with remote monitoring), and for higher sums insured, even physical guarding – the levels and thresholds vary by insurer and by sum insured, so every statement here is “typically” true. The critical rule: the security committed to in the policy has to actually be working at the moment of the loss – even the finest system is a breach of the terms if the alarm wasn't armed. Details: the burglary article.
The camera: evidence and deterrence
A camera system is rarely a mandatory requirement, but it has a double benefit: the footage provides evidence when there's a claim (how the intruder got in, when, what was taken), and a visible camera deters. Practical rules: keep the recordings for long enough (long enough to cover a long weekend, too), save the footage immediately when there's a loss, and make sure the system operates within the legal data-protection framework. Camera footage also speeds up the police side of things: what to do after a burglary.
Is it worth upgrading?
Upgrading security pays off in two ways: it lowers the probability of a loss, and it also gives you a better position on the insurance side – an improved risk profile can show up in the offers you get too. The practical order: first, make sure the level required by the terms is reliably met, then reinforce the weakest point (the back of the site, the boundary of the premises, key discipline). For a self-check: the security self-check; the full loss-prevention picture: loss prevention.
Alongside the technology, it's also worth weighing the service side: the response time of remote monitoring, the callout service, the maintenance contract. Insurance terms typically expect the system to be kept operational – the service provider's backing helps ensure that, and at claim time, the logged events (arming, triggering, callout) are decisive evidence.
Have a question specific to your premises? Book a free 20-minute site survey consultation →
