Behind “the insurer didn't pay” stories, there's rarely any arbitrariness – typically it's one of a handful of recurring, preventable reasons. Here they are, honestly, in order of frequency – each with a recipe for prevention.
- Most rejections come down to five reasons: underinsurance, an exclusion, a security gap, a late or incomplete report, and neglected maintenance.
- Every one of these can be dealt with before you take out the policy and during the year – not once you have a claim.
- There's a path against a disputable decision: requesting a justification, a complaint, help from the broker.
The five big reasons
1. Underinsurance: not a rejection, but a pro-rata reduction – the most common source of disappointment: how it works. 2. Loss falling under an exclusion: an event outside the boundaries of cover – groundwater, lack of maintenance, gradual damage: the exclusions map. 3. A security requirement wasn't met: an alarm that wasn't armed, an opening left unlocked in a burglary. 4. Late or incomplete reporting: missing the deadline, evidence that has disappeared, scrapping items without documentation. 5. Neglected maintenance: the connection between a neglected roof, a skipped inspection, and the loss.
What isn't a rejection, it just feels like one
Two common cases feel like a rejection but are actually the policy simply working as designed: deducting the deductible (the company agreed to carry part of the loss itself – in exchange for a lower premium), and hitting a limit (a sub-limit applied to one item, for example cash or property stored outdoors). Both are the consequence of a decision made when the policy was taken out – which is why it pays to set limits and the deductible deliberately: the logic of deductibles.
What can you do if you disagree?
First step: request a written, itemised justification – which clause in the terms the decision relies on. Second: check it against the policy – a good number of interpretation disputes get settled right here. Third: use the insurer's complaints channel, and bring in the broker: in a disputed case, I step in to help the company, with knowledge of the terms – how the broker helps. And the lesson-learned point is the same as always: make sure that whatever hurt this time is prevented before the next claim – the annual review.
Have a question specific to your premises? Book a free 20-minute site survey consultation →
