Insights · Process and decisions

Reviewing your existing policy: when do you NOT need to switch?

Let's say it plainly: not every policy needs replacing. A well-drafted, well-maintained policy has value – even if it wasn't arranged through me. The point of the review isn't to switch, it's a clear picture: what's there, what's missing, what's redundant – the decision is the client's from there.

In brief:
  • The review is a content-based check: cover, sums, limits, exclusions – not a premium hunt.
  • Three outcomes: everything's fine / an adjustment is enough / switching is justified – all three are good, if deliberate.
  • The most common finding isn't a bad insurer, it's outdated data: old sums, missing items.

What do we review?

We compare the policy and its terms with reality: do the sums for each asset group reflect today's values (underinsurance test); does the scope of cover match the actual risks (is glass, electronics, or off-premises cover missing); are the deductibles and limits suited to the company's capacity; which exclusions actually apply on this site; and are the endorsements (financing party!) up to date. It's typically half an hour's work – all it takes is the policy, the terms, and a picture of the premises; with multiple sites or a more complex machinery fleet, it takes longer than that.

When do I say: stay put?

If the content is right and the sums are well maintained, the policy is doing its job, and switching would be an unnecessary risk (new waiting periods, a chance of a gap in the handover, a lost claims-free record). In that case, the most you need is fine-tuning: keeping the indexation up to date, filling in one or two missing items within the existing framework. That's a legitimate outcome too – and more common than you'd think. A lower-priced quote alone isn't a reason to switch: the trap of a low premium.

When is switching justified?

If the review finds a gap in content that the current insurer can't or won't fix; if the market offers meaningfully better terms for the same content; or if claims-handling experience has repeatedly been poor. In that case, the switch is handled in an orderly way: a content-based comparison (table), a seamless handover (timing), and proper cancellation. The decision – here too – is the client's; my job is to make sure it's made from a clear picture.

Have a question specific to your premises? Book a free 20-minute site survey consultation →

This article is for information purposes only and contains general information; it does not constitute an offer or insurance advice. The precise content of insurance contracts is determined by the insurers' policy terms in force at any given time.

Related articles

Let's take a look together at what's on your premises – and what isn't in your policy.

A free 20-minute conversation, with no obligation – by the end you'll know exactly where you stand and what the next step is.

Book a call